Skip to footer

Prince Phantom 93P 14x18 Review

Price: 164,90 €MSRP: 249,95 €
Overall 84
Groundstrokes 83
Volleys 86
Serves 83
Returns 80
Power 77
Control 85
Maneuverability 80
Stability 88
Comfort 92
Touch/Feel 88
Topspin 88
Slice 86

Summary

Updated for 2020, the Prince Phantom 93P 14x18 remains a surgical, compact racquet with loads of spin potential and a classic box beam. As the modern successor to the legendary Prince Original Graphite Mid and Tour Diablo Mid, this racquet has a very open, relatively powerful and spin-friendly string pattern, which makes it ideal for advanced players with quick, modern swings. The Anti-Torsion System technology enhances the stability, while the CTS Beam provides more feel as the beam goes from 20.5 mm at the tip to a buttery-thin 16.5 mm in the shaft. Our team felt the racquet absorbed and redirected pace well. The playtesters were also able to spit out shots loaded with arc and spin to keep balls landing deep in the court, letting them dictate play. At net, they found easy depth, good stability and great feel to carve out everything from a touch volley to an aggressive, penetrating put-away. While serving, they traded pinpoint accuracy for loads of spin. On returns, everyone agreed that this racquet absorbed pace well, but the open string pattern occasionally led to an erratic feel. All in all, this racquet continues to be a magical combination of classic feel crafted to meet the demands of the modern spin game.

Upsides

  • Easy depth
  • Ridiculous levels of spin
  • Stable

Downsides

  • Can be difficult to gauge depth

Bottom Line

Fans of the previous version will notice minor changes, but this racquet continues to deliver easy spin and depth unlike other 93-square-inch head sizes.

Ability

Advanced

Groundstrokes - Score: 83

The playtest of the Phantom 93P 14x18 started on a positive note from the baseline. Chris really enjoyed rallying with this racquet. He said, "The Phantom 93 14x18 offers addictive levels of spin and plow through. I had fun seeing how much hop and penetration I could get out of my shots. As with the 18-mains version, I found this racquet easy to maneuver for its weight. The smaller head seemed to cut cleanly through the air, which allowed for some nice racquet head speed on a full swing. Slice was the one shot that could fly on me if I hit a little flat, so I made sure to maximize spin. While the response was lively, I still felt in control of my touch shots. With the 18x20 version I would use soft hands to feel the ball to a short target, but with this version I utilized spin to cut away pace and depth. I needed more time to get used to the racquet's weight on angle shots so I could flick them a bit easier, but on the flip side, I loved the solid heft on down-the-line drives. The open string pattern gives the racquet a very forgiving feel for a mid, and I loved the comfortable feel it offered."

Mark's initial impression from the baseline was also very positive. He said, "The feel and performance reminded me of the previous Phantom Pro 93P 18x20, which at one point was my racquet of choice. That said, the inherent higher launch angle of an open pattern made the 14x18 version of the 93P feel just a bit livelier than its dense-patterned equivalent. Consistently hitting deep groundstrokes with lots of shape required a little less effort compared to the 18x20 version. However, I was more challenged to keep my backhand slice low due to that higher launch angle."

"The Phantom 93 14x18 offered really good feel and stability on my groundstrokes," added Jason. "Even though I found the racquet tougher to generate racquet head speed with, I was still getting nice depth on my shots due to the higher launch angle. The weight of the racquet really helped block back hard-hit shots and allowed me to hit knifing slices. Where I struggled the most was hitting my forehand on the run. I felt like I wasn't getting the pace or the angles I was used to, and to top it off, the 93-square-inch head size was not nearly as forgiving as what I'm used to with 98 to 100 square inch heads."

As soon as he started rallying from the baseline with this racquet, Troy noticed a much higher launch angle compared to the 18x20 version. He said, "As I said in the review of the previous version, it was much easier to get the ball to rise up over the net and dip down fast on the other side compared to the Phantom 93P 18x20. When it came to the topspin potential and high launch angle, this racquet was unique due to its head size. I found amazing touch and feel whenever I went for a drop shot or short angle. I was also rewarded with a lively and spin-friendly response when ripping heavy topspin groundstrokes. There was a very solid and stable feel on contact, much like the 18x20 version; it was a nice and classic feel in that sense. The downside was when I tried to attack and flatten out my shots, the ball trajectory was a bit sporadic. Sometimes the ball to jumped off the stringbed and sprayed longer than I would have liked. On flatter strokes and slices is where I preferred the 18x20."

Prince Phantom 93P (14x18) Racket view 2

Volleys - Score: 86

Weighing just over 12 ounces, the Phantom 93P 14x18 felt stable at the net. Mark couldn't ask for more. He said, "I felt great volleying with this racquet in hand. If I were to be picky, occasionally I was not able to predict the exit angle of the ball as well as I could with the 18x20 version of the 93P."

When Jason made clean contact in the sweetspot the Phantom 93 14x18 felt fantastic. He said, "The mass could handle hard-hit passing shots; I just had to get the racquet out in front and let it do the work. Swinging volleys were more of a struggle. I found myself making contact a bit late because I just wasn't used to the extra mass and higher swingweight. However, the great feel made for a higher success rate with drop volleys."

Just like when he used the 18x20 version, Troy found good stability against heavy hitters. He explained, "I could block the ball back deep, and this 14x18 string pattern offered more power, which also helped with the depth on my volleys. I had very good control, but it was not quite as precise as the 18x20 version. The touch and feel of this racquet allowed me to caress the ball around the court and place my volleys in the corners with ease. Since I don't hit topspin on my volleys I have a slight preference for the 18x20 version at net. The Phantom 93P 18x20 gives me just a bit more feel and connection to the ball when it comes to volleys."

Chris had fun at net with the Phantom 93P 14x18. He said, "The response was a little more point and shoot with the open string pattern, and it felt like the ball was getting in and out of the stringbed quickly. I had fun punching volleys away and was able to tap into easy pace. I could up the spin on touch shots by cutting under the ball to get them to drop short quickly while curving away from my opponent. The Phantom 93P 14x18 was a stupidly fun racquet to hit with when looking to play a drop volley loaded with spin."

Prince Phantom 93P (14x18) Racket view 3

Serves - Score: 83

An open string pattern meant loads of kick and spin potential when serving with the Phantom 93P 14x18. Troy thought this was where the racquet really shone. He described, "When hitting my kick serves I was rewarded with easy net clearance, and I could generate a lot of arc on the ball. This allowed me to easily get the ball jumping up high above my opponents' shoulders, which made it tough for them to hit aggressive returns. I found good precision, but I wasn't as pinpoint with my placement as I was with the 18x20 version. When I went big on a flat first serve the wide-open string pattern helped to add some pace compared to the 18x20 version, but the ball was also a little less predictable when it came to depth control."

The serve was one of Chris' favorite shots to hit with the Phantom 93 14x18. He said, "I found impressive pace on first and second serves. My flatter deliveries didn't have the precision I get from either the 18x20 version or the similarly dense stringbed of my Tecnifibre TF40 305. However, I found I could add spin to maintain consistency on faster serves and just aim for slightly safer targets."

Similar to his experience with the Phantom 97P, Jason struggled to serve with this racquet. He explained, "Because I couldn't use my opponent's pace to help with power, I found that I was swinging harder than normal to compensate. On a positive note, I loved the 14x18 string pattern for getting spin on my slice serves."

"I really enjoyed serving with this open-patterned masterpiece," added Mark. "It turned out the serve was my favorite shot to hit with this updated racquet. I might say that my serve was better complemented using the 14x18 over the tight-patterned alternative. I was able to generate a little more action on the ball, regardless of whether the string choice was round or gear shaped."

Prince Phantom 93P (14x18) Racket view 3

Returns - Score: 80

The mass of the Prince Phantom 93P 14x18 provided a stable feel against big servers. Troy described, "With racquets that offer this type of solid, hefty feel, I love how I can block serves back deep with little effort. When I needed to chip returns back and felt rushed for time, I liked how the 14x18 pattern offered me a little more power and depth. The downside was when I had the time to take an aggressive swing on my returns, the ball occasionally sprayed a bit long. With the 18x20 version of this Phantom 93P, I felt like I could really slap at the returns with no fear of spraying the ball."

Chris liked taking a good rip at the ball on his returns. He said, "The racquet responded by adding some useful spin and pace to my shots. Again, the comfort was exceptional, so even if I caught a hard serve a little off center it was no biggie. I was able to use a firm co-poly string in this racquet to further enhance the spin and add some nice control."

While Mark admits his return of serve is not always the most reliable part of his game, he was pleased with the success he found with the Phantom 93 14x18. He explained, "The more I returned serves with this stick the more I enjoyed hitting that shot. I felt particularly effective when the serve was aimed up high to my backhand. I could just chop down on the ball, relegating my opponent to a defensive reply and fewer post-serve smiles."

Jason really appreciated this racquet's 12-ounce weight when returning against bigger servers. He said, "The Phantom 93 14x18 allowed me to return shots with depth and spin without needing to take full cuts. Control was a tad bit tougher because of the higher launch angle and because I was a little late when trying to swing out. I found the most success by being aggressive and aiming for large targets. The spin I could get on my forehand was giving my opponents a noticeably tougher time versus my own racquet. I just wanted more free power."

Overall - Score: 84

Likes

Chris - "I loved the spin, comfort, feel and the pace I could get on serves. Hitting spinny drop volleys was a blast."

Mark - "I was not on the official test of the first iteration of the open-patterned version of the Phantom 93P, but I have played quite a bit with it and feel the newer one is very much like the prior. Because of the higher launch angle the 14x18 pattern produces (even without the assistance of a shaped string), it is easier to play with compared to the 18x20, so it might be a better overall choice for my game."

Jason - "Really nice feel and arm-friendly flex. The 14x18 pattern gives the ball a higher launch angle, which means effortless depth."

Troy - "For a mid-size racquet, the Phantom 93P 14x18's spin potential and easy launch angle is unlike anything else on the market. It feels very maneuverable for a 12+ ounce racquet, and it does a great job supplying a solid, classic feel while being extremely topspin friendly at the same time."

Dislikes

Chris - "I just need a tad more time with the Phantom mids to get used to the weight of this spec again."

Mark - "I feel like I am being picky to mention an aspect about this frame that I did not like because I think it is one of the best mid-size frames I have ever played with, but its wide-open 14x18 string pattern did occasionally produce some higher arcing shots than I would have predicted."

Jason - "More free power would be nice."

Troy - "It is a bit difficult to gauge the depth when I try to play aggressively and flatten out some of my shots. When it comes to flatter strokes and slice shots, I prefer the Phantom 93P 18x20."

Comparing the racquet to others they've tried, our testers said:

Chris - "A great update to an already impressive racquet, the new Prince Phantom 93P 14x18 seemed to be subtly improved in every area. Users of the previous version should find this a seamless and enjoyable transition. I highly recommend adding one to your demo list now."

Mark - "The first generation of the Phantom 93P 14x18 is more like the new model than not, and aside from their respective string patterns, the Phantom 93P 18x20 is similar as well. From there, the herd thins out a bit, but the Head Prestige Mid, MP and Pro all share some similar traits, along with the Dunlop Srixon CX 200 Tour 18x20."

Jason - "There isn't much difference between this updated Phantom 93P 14x18 and the previous model. I'd say it does feel more forgiving on shots hit toward the tip of the racquet."

Troy - "There isn't anything on the current market that compares to the Prince Phantom 93P 14x18. The closest racquets would likely be the Volkl Power Bridge 10 Mid or Head Graphene Touch Prestige Mid, but neither is as spin friendly as this Phantom. The older Wilson Pro Staff 95S and Wilson Six One 95S had similar levels of spin to the Phantom 93P 14x18, but I found better control with this racquet."

Technical Specifications
Length27 in69 cm
Head Size93 sq in600 sq cm
Weight12.1 oz343 gm
Balance Point12.59 in 32 cm7pts Head Light
Construction20.5mm/19.5mm/16.5mm
CompositionTextreme/Twaron/Graphite
String Pattern14 Mains / 18 Crosses
Babolat RDC Ratings
ScoreGrade
Flex Rating62Range: 0-100
Swing Weight329Range: 200-400
 
Chris' Scores
Power8.5Serves9.1
Control8.7Groundstrokes8.9
Maneuverability7.9Returns8.4
Stability8.6Slice9
Comfort9.7Topspin9.4
Touch/Feel9.3Volleys9.6
Overall8.8
Mark's Scores
Power7.5Serves8
Control8Groundstrokes7.5
Maneuverability7.5Returns7.5
Stability9Slice8
Comfort8.5Topspin8
Touch/Feel8Volleys8
Overall8
Jason's Scores
Power7.9Serves8
Control8.5Groundstrokes8.3
Maneuverability8Returns8
Stability8.5Slice8.8
Comfort9.1Topspin8.9
Touch/Feel9Volleys8.2
Overall8.2
Troy's Scores
Power6.9Serves8.1
Control8.9Groundstrokes8.5
Maneuverability8.7Returns8.2
Stability9.2Slice8.7
Comfort9.3Topspin9
Touch/Feel8.9Volleys8.7
Overall8.5
Price: 164,90 €MSRP: 249,95 €

Playtester Profiles

Chris: 4.5 all-court player currently using the Tecnifibre TF40 305. Chris uses a full-western forehand grip, has a fast swing style and hits a one-handed backhand.

Troy: 5.0 lefty all-court player with a full Western Forehand and a two-handed backhand. Troy currently plays with a Yonex VCORE Pro 97 330.

Jason: 4.0 baseliner with a semi-western forehand and two-handed backhand. Currently using a Babolat Pure Strike 16x19 (Project One7).

Mark: 5.0 lefty all-court player with a one-handed backhand. He currently plays with the Head Graphene 360+ Gravity Pro.

Play Tester Profiles
On a HUGE selection of rackets
On a HUGE selection of rackets
On Select Tennis Rackets
On Select Tennis Rackets
On a HUGE selection of shoes
On a HUGE selection of shoes